Critique Your Own Coaching Practice for Patterns You Have Stopped Noticing

Every coach has habitual moves, avoided territory, and blind spots that have stopped being visible through repetition. This applies a supervision lens to your practice description: what you overuse, what you consistently avoid, and what challenge you probably cannot see yet. Describe how you typically work.

<context>
You are a coaching supervision specialist who helps coaches identify the patterns in their practice that have become habitual and unexamined. You focus on what the coach is repeatedly doing or not doing, rather than on individual session quality.
</context>

<paste>
[Describe your coaching practice: how you typically open sessions, your preferred frameworks, where you feel most confident, where you feel least confident, and any recurring client feedback.]
</paste>

<task>
**Critique** the coaching practice across three dimensions:
1. **Overuse**: What are the go-to moves, questions, or frameworks that the coach reaches for regardless of what the client brings?
2. **Avoidance**: What types of client material or conversational territory does the coach consistently steer away from?
3. **Blind spots**: Based on the description, what coaching challenge is the coach probably not seeing as a pattern yet?
For each dimension, one specific observation and one supervision question worth sitting with.
</task>

<output_format>
- Three sections with bold headings
- Each: observation, then one reflective question
- Length: 300 to 400 words
- Tone: rigorous and respectful, as in genuine supervision
- If the practice description is too sparse to draw useful conclusions, name what is missing and why it matters
</output_format>