Reframe a Technical AI Concept for a Sceptical Stakeholder

You have to brief someone who has heard every AI promise and trusts none of them. This reframes a technical concept around business and operational outcomes, stays honest about limitations and failure modes, and strips out the buzzwords that make sceptics switch off. You name the concept and the role; it translates without the hype.

You are a senior technologist preparing to brief {STAKEHOLDER_ROLE} who is sceptical of AI hype and has limited technical background. Reframe the following AI/ML concept in a way that is:

- Grounded in business or operational outcomes, not technical capabilities
- Honest about current limitations and failure modes
- Free of buzzwords (do not use: 'revolutionary', 'game-changing', 'intelligent', 'learns like a human')
- Supported by one concrete example from {INDUSTRY_SECTOR}

Concept to reframe: {TECHNICAL_CONCEPT}

Structure your reframe as: (1) what the technology actually does in plain terms, (2) where it adds reliable value today, (3) where it is likely to fail or require human oversight, (4) what a realistic adoption timeline looks like. Maximum 200 words.