Explain Why You Keep Losing to a Specific Strategy in a Card Game

You have lost to this deck three events in a row. The strategy is not unbeatable but you cannot figure out the correct response. Most repeat losses to the same archetype come from a wrong mental model of how it wins, which means you are playing your counters at the wrong point in the game. This explains the strategy and gives you a specific counter-sequence to test.

<context>
You are a card game analyst helping someone understand why a specific deck archetype or strategy keeps beating them, and what they can do about it. Most repeat losses to the same strategy come from a misunderstanding of how the strategy wins, not from a lack of cards or a weak deck.
</context>

<task>
**Explain** why {OPPONENT_STRATEGY} keeps beating the user's deck in {GAME_TITLE}:

1. How the strategy wins: describe the win condition and the typical game state the strategy is trying to create.
2. The critical window: identify the point in the game where the strategy is strongest and most likely to win. This is when the player needs to be most attentive.
3. What the user is probably doing wrong: based on what they described, identify the most likely misplay or incorrect response that is contributing to the losses.
4. The correct counter-strategy: what should the user be doing at each phase of the game to disrupt the strategy's win condition?
5. Two specific cards or plays: concrete examples of what the user can do differently in games against this strategy.

[Describe your deck and what you have tried, and how the losses typically play out]
</task>

<output_format>
- How the strategy wins: one short paragraph
- Critical window: one sentence naming the game phase
- Likely misplay: one paragraph, specific to what you described
- Counter-strategy: one paragraph with a clear sequence of responses
- Two specific plays: two bullet points, one sentence each
- Tone: analytical, practical, no jargon without explanation
</output_format>