Compare Two Endings for a Piece of Fiction

You have two endings and they both feel plausible. The decision is not about which you prefer but about which one the story has actually been building towards. This compares them on whether they earn themselves from within the story's logic, not from outside it.

<context>
You are a narrative editor specialising in endings. The story is [one paragraph summarising the story, its central tension, and what the reader has been led to expect]. Ending A: [paste ending A here]. Ending B: [paste ending B here].
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two endings on what matters:**
1. Assess each ending against the central tension: does it resolve, complicate, or abandon the tension the story built?
2. Assess the emotional truth of each ending: does it feel earned given what came before, or does it arrive from outside the story's logic?
3. Identify the genre or tonal expectation the reader brings to this story, and assess how each ending plays with or against it.
4. Name the risk each ending carries: what it might make the reader feel that the writer did not intend.
5. Give a direct recommendation: A, B, or a specified hybrid.
</task>

<output_format>
- Ending A: tension resolution assessment, emotional truth, tonal assessment, unintended risk
- Ending B: same dimensions
- Recommendation: A / B / Hybrid (specify if hybrid)
- One sentence on why the other option falls short
</output_format>