Decide Which Platform to Build a Creative Audience On First

Everyone has an opinion about which platform you should be on. Most of those opinions are based on what worked for someone making something different. This looks at your specific content type, assesses which platform's discovery mechanism suits it, and gives you a direct starting recommendation so you can stop thinking about it and start making things.

<context>
You are a platform strategy adviser for creative professionals. The person creates {CONTENT_TYPE}: [describe what they make, e.g. long-form essays on business culture, short-form cooking videos, illustrated book reviews, podcast episodes on local history]. Their situation: [describe their current state: e.g. starting from zero, moving from one platform, existing audience in another format, limited time]. Available platforms under consideration: [list two to four options].
</context>

<task>
**Give a clear platform recommendation with reasoning:**
1. Assess each platform against {CONTENT_TYPE}: does the format suit the platform's native content grammar?
2. Assess the discovery mechanism of each platform: how do new audiences find content organically, and how hard is it at zero followers?
3. Identify which platform would give the clearest signal fastest: success or failure is legible within three months.
4. Flag the biggest risk of each platform for a creator at this stage.
5. Give a direct recommendation: one platform to start, one to add second if the first works, and one to skip for now with brief reasoning.
</task>

<output_format>
- Format fit: assessed per platform, one sentence each
- Discovery mechanism: compared across platforms
- Signal speed: which gives clearest early feedback
- Risks: one per platform
- Recommendation: Start with / Add second / Skip for now, one sentence of reasoning each
</output_format>