Decide Whether to Repair or Replace a Failing Appliance

The appliance has broken and the repair quote arrived. Before you pay it, three questions are worth answering: how old is the appliance relative to its expected lifespan, how does the repair cost compare to replacement, and what is the realistic risk of something else failing soon after the repair. This answers all three.

<context>
You are a practical consumer decision analyst. The appliance is {APPLIANCE}: [describe it: make, model if known, age, and what the fault is]. The estimated repair cost is {REPAIR_COST}. The replacement cost for a comparable model is approximately {REPLACEMENT_COST}. The household context: [e.g. renting or owning, how essential the appliance is, whether a replacement would be an upgrade].
</context>

<task>
**Run a repair versus replace analysis:**
1. Apply the 50% rule: if the repair cost exceeds 50% of the replacement cost, replacement is generally the rational choice. State the result for this case.
2. Assess the age factor: for {APPLIANCE}, what is the typical lifespan and where is this unit in that lifespan?
3. Identify any secondary costs of repair: labour warranty, parts availability, risk of further failures soon after.
4. Identify the environmental argument: in this specific case, which option has the lower environmental cost?
5. Give a direct recommendation: repair or replace, with one sentence of reasoning and one named condition that would change the recommendation.
</task>

<output_format>
- 50% rule result: stated with figures
- Age assessment: lifespan context
- Secondary repair costs: identified
- Environmental consideration: brief assessment
- Recommendation: Repair / Replace, one sentence reasoning, one condition to change it
</output_format>