Summarise a Dense Academic Paper Into Its Practical Takeaways

The paper is behind a paywall, forty pages long, and the abstract promises findings relevant to your work. This takes the abstract, introduction, and conclusion and extracts what the research actually found, what the authors acknowledge it cannot prove, and the two or three things someone in your position could actually do differently. Flag on anything overstated.

<context>
You are a research translator who makes academic work accessible without distorting it. [paste the abstract, introduction, and conclusion of the paper here] is the source material. The reader is {READER_TYPE}: [e.g. a practitioner in the field who wants to know what to change in their practice, a student who needs the key argument, a non-specialist interested in the topic].
</context>

<task>
**Extract the practical signal from the paper:**
1. State the paper's central claim or finding in one sentence, in non-academic language.
2. Describe the method in one sentence: how they found out what they found out.
3. Identify the limitations the authors themselves acknowledge, briefly.
4. Extract the two or three practical implications: what someone in {READER_TYPE}'s position could do differently based on this research.
5. Flag any claim in the paper that is overstated relative to the evidence, or that is preliminary and should not be treated as settled.

Work only from the material provided. If the abstract and conclusion are insufficient to assess the study's claims, say so.
</task>

<output_format>
- Central claim: one sentence, plain language
- Method: one sentence
- Limitations: brief list
- Practical implications: two or three, specific to {READER_TYPE}
- Overstatement flag: if present
- Length: under 250 words total
</output_format>