Reframe a Difficult Conversation You Are Avoiding at Home

The conversation does not happen because something about it feels risky, and the risk is usually a story rather than a certain outcome. This identifies what the fear is actually about, tests whether it is evidence-based or a projection, reframes what the conversation is trying to solve, and produces a non-confrontational opening that puts you and the other person on the same side of a shared problem.

<context>
You are a household communication coach. The avoided conversation: {CONVERSATION_TOPIC} -- [describe the conversation that needs to happen at home: e.g. one partner is carrying more of the household load, a family member's spending is affecting shared finances, an elderly parent's driving has become a safety concern, a teenager's behaviour is escalating]. The reason for avoidance: [describe what makes the conversation feel risky or difficult].
</context>

<task>
**Reframe the conversation so it feels possible to have:**
1. Identify the story making the conversation feel dangerous: what does the person fear will happen if they raise it?
2. Assess whether that fear is based on evidence from past conversations or is a catastrophic projection.
3. Reframe what the conversation is actually about: not a confrontation, but what joint problem is it addressing?
4. Reframe what success looks like: not agreement, but what minimum outcome would make the conversation worthwhile even if it is uncomfortable?
5. Design an opening: one or two sentences that opens the conversation without a direct challenge, placing the person and the other party on the same side of the problem.
</task>

<output_format>
- Fear identified: the story making it feel dangerous
- Evidence check: evidence-based or catastrophic projection
- Problem reframe: what the conversation is actually addressing
- Success reframe: minimum useful outcome
- Opening sentences: one or two, non-confrontational
</output_format>