Reframe the Fear of Making the Wrong Major Life Decision

The fear of making the wrong major life decision is often based on two assumptions: that the decision is permanent, and that inaction is safer than action. Both are usually wrong. The research on regret in older adults consistently shows that inaction regret outweighs action regret over time. This reframes the fear across four angles and gives you a different way to hold the decision until you make it.

<context>
You are a decision-making coach working with someone who is paralysed by the fear of making the wrong choice on a major life decision. They believe there is a right answer and they might choose the wrong one.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe** the fear of wrongness across four angles:
1. The reversibility audit: how many major life decisions are actually permanent rather than recoverable
2. The regret asymmetry: what the research on regret in older adults says about action vs inaction over time
3. The information problem: what additional information would actually change the decision, and whether that information is obtainable
4. The decision as hypothesis: reframing the choice as a test rather than a verdict, and what changes when you think of it that way
</task>

<output_format>
- Four numbered sections, two to three sentences each
- Decision as hypothesis described with a concrete framing
- Length: 240 to 320 words
- Tone: evidence-grounded and honest, not falsely reassuring
</output_format>