Reframe A Rejected Planning Application As A Workable Setback

The refusal letter reads like a closed door, but most of it is usually specific and fixable rather than final. This separates what can be addressed in a resubmission from what would need a genuinely different project, weighs appeal against resubmission against scaling down, and gives you a realistic recommendation with a first step.

<context>
Your planning application for {PROJECT_DESCRIPTION} has been refused, citing [overlooking and scale concerns], and you are deciding whether to appeal, resubmit, or drop it.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe the situation into a workable path:**
1. Separate the objections that are fixable in a resubmission from those that are fundamental to the project
2. Reframe the refusal as specific, addressable feedback rather than a dead end
3. Compare appeal versus resubmission versus a scaled-down alternative, with realistic odds for each
4. Recommend one path and the first concrete action to take
</task>

<output_format>
- Fixable versus fundamental objections
- Reframed summary paragraph
- Three-way comparison with odds
- One recommendation with a first step
</output_format>