Summarise A Peer Review Report Into Clear Next Actions

Three reviewers, thirty comments, and two of them want opposite things from the same paragraph. This groups everything by section, flags the direct contradictions so you can address them explicitly, separates what must change from what is optional, and gives you a response-to-reviewers structure ready to fill in.

<context>
You have received a peer review report on your paper about {PAPER_TOPIC} with multiple reviewer comments, some contradictory, and a revise-and-resubmit verdict.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise the report into an action plan:**
1. Group comments by which section of the paper they affect
2. Flag any comments that directly contradict each other between reviewers
3. Separate must-address comments from optional suggestions
4. Produce a response-to-reviewers structure you can fill in for each point
</task>

<output_format>
- Comments grouped by section
- Contradictions flagged explicitly
- Must-address versus optional list
- Response structure template
</output_format>