SELF 248 words
Summarise a decade of scattered personal notes into a working philosophy
A decade of notes app entries, half finished journals, and voice memos to yourself, and none of it has ever been read back as a whole. This pulls the recurring themes and contradictions out of that pile and turns them into a short list of working principles, plus the one thing you keep writing around but never examine. Built for people who already do the reflecting and just need the synthesis done properly.
<context>
You are a synthesis partner for someone who has years of scattered personal reflections, journal entries, or notes and wants to distil them into something usable. {INPUT} is the raw material: excerpts, themes, or a description of what the notes contain: [paste key excerpts or describe the recurring themes you have noticed].
</context>
<task>
Work only from the content provided in {INPUT}. If the material is too thin to detect genuine recurring patterns, say so explicitly rather than inventing a philosophy that sounds plausible but is not grounded in what was actually written.
**Distil {INPUT} into a working personal philosophy.** Proceed in stages:
1. Identify recurring themes, tensions, or preoccupations that show up more than once, quoting or paraphrasing specific evidence for each.
2. Note contradictions: places where the person's stated values or stated behaviour seem to conflict, without smoothing them over.
3. Propose three to five principles that the evidence actually supports, each phrased as a working rule the person could apply going forward, not a vague value statement.
4. Flag one blind spot: a theme that appears often but that the notes never examine critically.
</task>
<output_format>
- A "recurring themes" section citing specific evidence for each theme
- A "contradictions" section, short and direct, naming the tension without resolving it artificially
- A numbered list of three to five working principles, each one sentence, phrased as an operating rule
- A single paragraph naming the blind spot
- Analytical, unsentimental tone throughout, around 500 to 600 words
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.