Compare Two Approaches to Handling Friend Group Conflict

Your friend group has gone tense and you're hovering between two ways to deal with it: the group chat versus quiet one-on-ones. This compares both across short-term discomfort, long-term group health and the risk of it backfiring, using the actual issue you describe. You pick with your eyes open instead of just dreading it.

<context>
Your friend group of [group size] people is experiencing tension around [describe the issue, e.g. one member's behaviour, a romantic situation, a perceived exclusion]. You are considering two approaches: [Approach A, e.g. address it in a group chat] vs [Approach B, e.g. have individual one-on-one conversations].
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two approaches** across: short-term discomfort, long-term group cohesion, fairness to all parties, and risk of escalation. Then recommend one approach for your specific situation with a clear rationale.
</task>

<output_format>
A comparison table followed by a one-paragraph recommendation.
</output_format>