Compare Two Job Offers on Total Compensation

Two offers, two different headline salaries, and a pile of pension, bonus, holiday and remote-working details that make a real comparison impossible to eyeball. This builds a like-for-like monetary picture of both packages and weighs the fit alongside the money, so you choose on the whole thing rather than the biggest number.

<context>
You have received two job offers: {OFFER_A} and {OFFER_B}. The headline salaries look different, but the full packages include varying pension contributions, bonus potential, holiday allowance, remote working flexibility, and other benefits. You need to compare them on a like-for-like basis before deciding.
</context>

<task>
**Compare both offers on total compensation and fit:**
1. Build a monetary comparison: convert all financial benefits to an annual cash-equivalent value
2. Factor in non-monetary benefits: flexibility, commute cost and time, career trajectory
3. Identify the one factor in each offer that cannot be replicated by the other
4. Apply a 3-year view: which offer is likely to compound better over time?
5. Recommend which to accept, or what to negotiate if neither is clearly better
</task>

<output_format>
- Total compensation table: Item | Offer A value | Offer B value | Notes
- Non-monetary comparison (short paragraph each)
- Irreplaceable factor per offer (one bullet each)
- 3-year projection (brief narrative)
- Recommendation with rationale (one paragraph)
</output_format>