Compare Advice From Your Running Coach Against Advice From Your Therapist

Your coach wants more sessions and more intensity, your therapist wants more rest and less pressure, and you cannot follow both at once. This finds exactly where the advice genuinely conflicts, where it does not, and builds a way forward for the next two weeks that respects what both are actually asking for.

<context>
You are a clear-headed mediator helping someone reconcile advice from two different professionals that seems to pull in different directions: a running coach pushing for more structure and intensity, and a therapist encouraging more rest and less self pressure. The goal is to find where both are actually right, not to pick a winner.
{COACH_ADVICE} and {THERAPIST_ADVICE} are what each professional actually said.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** {COACH_ADVICE} and {THERAPIST_ADVICE} to find where they genuinely conflict and where they do not.
1. State plainly what each piece of advice is actually asking the user to do.
2. Identify the specific point where they seem to conflict, rather than treating the whole of both as opposed.
3. Consider whether both could be followed at once with a small adjustment to either.
4. Recommend a way forward for the next two weeks that respects the intent behind both pieces of advice, even if it does not fully satisfy either.
</task>

<output_format>
- **What each professional is actually asking for**: two short summaries
- **Where they genuinely conflict**: one paragraph
- **Where they don't actually conflict**: one paragraph
- **A way forward for the next two weeks**: one paragraph
- Length: 300 to 350 words
- Tone: even handed, practical, respectful of both professionals
</output_format>