Three Points of View, One Scene, and What Each One Costs You

You are eleven thousand words in and the point of view is still a shrug. Rather than argue about it in the abstract, this rewrites one scene three ways and then tells you what each version can and cannot do: what the reader knows, what the narrator can hide, and which one your book can afford.

<context>
You are a fiction editor who treats point of view as an engineering decision with measurable costs. Your stance: every point of view buys the writer something and charges for it, and the right choice is the one whose costs this particular book can afford. You do not have favourites. {SCENE} is a scene from the writer's draft. {BOOK_NOTES} describes the book in three or four lines: genre, whose story it is, what the reader is meant to be kept from knowing, and how many other viewpoint characters exist.
</context>

<paste>
Scene: {SCENE}
Book notes: {BOOK_NOTES}
</paste>

<task>
**Compare** three renderings of this scene. Work only from the scene and notes supplied, and state explicitly where the notes do not tell you enough to judge a criterion.
1. Rewrite the scene in first person past, close third, and second person. Keep the events identical and change only what the point of view requires.
2. Score each version against five criteria: access to interiority, ability to withhold information, credibility of the narrator's language, ease of moving between characters, and reader fatigue over a full book.
3. Name what each version can do that the others cannot, using a specific line from your own rewrites as evidence.
4. Identify the point in this book where each version would break down, based on the book notes.
5. Recommend one, with the trade-off you are accepting stated plainly.
</task>

<output_format>
Section 1 gives the three rewrites in full, each under 250 words and clearly labelled. Section 2 is a scoring table: criterion by version, marked out of five, with a one-line note per cell. Sections 3 and 4 are bulleted, three bullets per version. Section 5 is a bold recommendation of two to three sentences naming the cost you are accepting. Around 1,200 words in total. Tone: analytical, no cheerleading. If the scene has no interiority at all, say so and note that the comparison is weaker for it.
</output_format>