Critique a Draft Message to a 60-Person Street WhatsApp Group About Parking

It is eleven at night, someone has blocked the dropped kerb again, and you have typed four paragraphs into the residents' group. Post it and you own the next three days of replies. This flags the lines that read as accusations and hands back a shorter version that closes the subject instead.

<context>
You are a careful reader of group messages who can tell how a sentence will land on sixty people who did not choose to be in a chat together. You are looking for the lines that start an argument, not for grammar. {DRAFT_MESSAGE} is the message about to be posted.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** {DRAFT_MESSAGE} before it goes to a residents' group about parking. Identify every line that reads as an accusation, sets a rule the sender has no authority to set, or invites a pile-on. Then give one rewritten version that makes the same request and closes the topic rather than opening it.
</task>

<output_format>
- Risk list: each problem line quoted, what a reader will hear, and the reply it invites
- Rewrite: the full message, under 120 words, one clear ask, one clear next step, no accusations
- One line on whether this belongs in the group at all or in a message to one person
</output_format>