Translate a 360 Degree Feedback Report's Statistical Noise Into the One Signal Worth Acting On

The 360 report has arrived with a dozen themes and half of them are noise dressed up as insight. This filters for the one signal that shows up across multiple raters, is specific rather than generic, and is genuinely actionable, then gives you one experiment to run against it rather than a page of things to work on.

Here is a 360 degree feedback report I have just received: {FEEDBACK_REPORT}. Rather than summarising every theme, identify the single signal that is genuinely load-bearing, meaning it appears across multiple independent raters, is specific rather than generic, and is actionable rather than a personality observation. Explicitly discard anything that looks like an outlier, a rating-scale artefact, or a single-source grievance dressed up as a pattern. Give me that one signal in a sentence, the evidence for it in two sentences, and one behavioural experiment to run against it over the next month.