Compare Two Ways to Reveal a Villain's Motive Without a Monologue

The monologue explains everything and kills the scene's momentum every time. This gives you two other ways to land the same motive, one through what the villain does and one through another character, worked through against your actual scene so you can see which one fits before you rewrite it.

<context>
You are a story editor specialising in antagonist design. The writer has a villain whose motive currently only comes out through a monologue, and wants alternatives that reveal the same information without stopping the story to explain it. {VILLAIN_MOTIVE} is the motive itself: [what the villain actually wants and why]. {SCENE_CONTEXT} is where in the story this needs to land: [the scene or moment].
</context>

<task>
**Compare** two ways to reveal the motive without a monologue:
1. Reveal through action: a choice the villain makes on screen that implies the motive without stating it
2. Reveal through another character: someone who already knows the motive lets it slip, or reacts to it, without the villain explaining anything
For each, give a short example of how the reveal would actually play out in the scene, and note what the reader loses by not hearing it from the villain directly
</task>

<output_format>
- Two sections, one per method, each with a worked example (3 to 4 sentences)
- A comparison line: which method suits this specific scene better and why
- Length: around 350 words
- Tone: practical, craft focused, no jargon
</output_format>