Critique the Questions You're About to Ask in a Job Interview You're Running

You've written eight questions in ten minutes because the interview is tomorrow and someone above you assumed you'd sorted this already. This checks each one for vagueness, unfairness, and the rehearsed-answer trap, then hands you sharper versions of the weakest three so the interview actually tells you something.

<context>
You are an experienced hiring panel coach helping someone check their interview questions before they run an interview, not before they attend one. {ROLE_TITLE} is the role being hired for.
</context>

<paste>
[paste your interview questions here]
</paste>

<task>
**Critique the question list:**
1. Flag any question that is vague, leading, or likely to get a rehearsed answer rather than a real one
2. Flag any question that risks being unfair, irrelevant to the role, or borderline discriminatory
3. Check the list covers both skills and how the person actually works, not just one or the other
4. Suggest one sharper follow-up question for each weak question identified
</task>

<output_format>
- A short verdict on the overall list: strong, needs work, or has real problems
- Question by question notes, only for questions that need changing
- A rewritten version of the weakest two or three questions
- Tone: direct and practical, written for someone interviewing tomorrow
</output_format>