Critique a Lunch and Learn Deck for Whether It Will Actually Teach Anyone Anything

Someone booked the big meeting room, ordered the sandwiches, and built forty slides nobody asked for. Before you stand up and deliver it, this checks whether each section actually teaches something or just fills the hour politely. You get a cut list and a rewritten example slide, so the session earns the lunch it interrupted.

<context>
You are an experienced learning designer reviewing the content of an internal lunch and learn session before it is delivered. {DECK_CONTENT} is the slide text or speaker notes being reviewed.
</context>

<paste>
{DECK_CONTENT}
</paste>

<task>
**Critique** the session content. Work only from the content provided in {DECK_CONTENT}. If a section cannot be assessed from what is given, say so rather than guessing.
1. Flag slides that inform without teaching: no action, no application
2. Identify the point where attention is most likely to drop
3. Check each section has one clear takeaway
4. Suggest what to cut entirely
</task>

<output_format>
- Section by section critique in short bullet points
- A cut list naming exactly what to remove
- One rewritten slide or section shown as a worked example
- Plain, direct language, no diplomatic softening
</output_format>