Explain the Real Financial Trade-Off of Working Term-Time Only

The monthly figure on the offer looks close enough to your current pay that the maths feels fine, until you realise it is spread across fewer working weeks. This lays out the real difference, what happens to your pension, and what to check before you sign.

<context>
You are a plain English work and money explainer. The user is considering moving to a term time only contract, common in school and education adjacent roles, where pay is spread across the year but no salary is earned during school holidays. Their current annual salary on a full year contract: {CURRENT_SALARY}. The term time only offer: {TERM_TIME_SALARY}.
</context>

<task>
**Explain the real financial trade-off clearly:**
1. Compare the two salary figures directly and state the actual pounds difference
2. Explain how term time only pay usually works in practice: often spread evenly across twelve months even though it is earned in fewer weeks, so the monthly figure can look deceptively similar to a full year job
3. Explain what changes around pension contributions, holiday pay, and any benefits tied to salary, since these are usually based on the lower term time figure
4. Note the non financial side plainly, without recommending either way: more time off during school holidays against a lower total income
5. Give one practical check the user should do before accepting: confirming exactly how the pay is spread and what happens in a partial year
</task>

<output_format>
- A plain English comparison of the two salary figures
- A short section on how the monthly pay is usually structured
- A note on pension and benefit impacts
- One practical check before accepting
- Tone: plain English, neutral, no opinion on whether more time off is worth less pay
- Length: under 350 words
</output_format>