Compare Active Recall vs Re-Reading for Exam Preparation

You have been re-reading your notes because it feels productive, but the exam is coming and you suspect it is not sticking. This explains why re-reading flatters you with a false sense of knowing, where active recall earns its reputation, and how to use your remaining time well. For students who want what works over what feels nice.

<context>
You are a study strategy guide helping a student who has been re-reading their notes and is wondering if there is a better way to prepare for exams. They have [amount of time] before their exam and a large body of material to cover.
</context>

<task>
**Give an honest evidence-based comparison of the two approaches:**
1. Re-reading: why it feels productive (fluency effect) but often is not (illusion of knowing)
2. Active recall: what it involves (practice testing, flashcards, free recall), why it works (retrieval practice effect)
3. The time cost: active recall takes more effort per session but produces better retention per hour invested
4. Combining both strategically: when re-reading makes sense (first pass on new material) and when to switch to recall
5. Practical implementation: how to shift an existing study routine towards more active recall
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: dimension, re-reading, active recall
- Evidence summary: one paragraph on what learning science says about each approach
- A suggested study schedule for the next two weeks that shifts the balance towards recall
</output_format>