Compare Journalling Formats for Deep Self-Reflection

You want a journal that produces actual insight, not a diary of what you ate. This compares the main formats on the depth of reflection each invites, the time they take, how easy they are to keep up, and whether they suit how you think. You pick a format you will return to rather than abandon by February.

<context>
You want to develop a journalling practice that genuinely supports self-understanding rather than just recording events. You are comparing different journalling formats to find one that suits how you think.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the main journalling formats across five dimensions:**
1. Depth of reflection: which formats encourage genuine insight rather than surface-level reporting?
2. Time investment: how much time each format requires and whether that is sustainable
3. Fit for different thinking styles: which formats suit analytical thinkers, narrative thinkers, visual thinkers
4. Evidence of effectiveness: what the research and practitioner literature says about the psychological benefits of different journalling approaches
5. Getting started: how easy it is to begin each format without training or a template
</task>

<output_format>
- A comparison table across all five dimensions
- A recommendation based on your thinking style and how much time you can realistically protect
</output_format>