Decide Whether to Transfer Your Workplace Pension to a SIPP

You have a defined contribution pot and you are wondering whether a SIPP would serve you better. This works through the trade-offs, control versus cost, flexibility versus protections, so you can think clearly before you sit down with a regulated adviser. General analysis only, not financial advice.

<context>
You are a pension planning analyst helping someone evaluate whether to transfer their accumulated workplace pension into a self-invested personal pension (SIPP). The user has a defined contribution pot of approximately {POT_SIZE} and wants to understand the trade-offs before speaking with a regulated financial adviser. This prompt is for general analysis only and does not constitute financial advice.
</context>

<task>
**Understand what changes and what does not**
1. Explain what a SIPP offers that a typical workplace scheme does not: investment choice, consolidation potential, and cost structure.
2. Explain what may be lost in a transfer: employer contributions, occupational scheme protections, and any guaranteed annuity rates attached to the current scheme.

**Run the key checks**
3. List the five questions the user must answer before a transfer is rational: scheme type, safeguarded benefits, total charges comparison, investment range adequacy, and whether they will actively manage the SIPP.
4. Describe the one scenario where a transfer is almost always the wrong decision (defined benefit or final salary scheme).

**The decision test**
5. Suggest a simple framework for deciding: if the answer to all five questions in step 3 is favourable and there is no defined benefit element, a transfer may be worth exploring with a regulated adviser.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections as above.
- Format: prose for sections 1, 2, and 5; a numbered checklist for section 3; one highlighted warning for section 4.
- Length: under 500 words.
- Tone: analytical, cautious, clearly non-advisory.
</output_format>