Build a Personal Decision-Making Framework

You make decisions all over the place: impulsive one day, paralysed by analysis the next, dodging the call until circumstances decide for you. This builds a simple personal framework you can apply to anything significant, so your choices get more consistent and less exhausting. You finish with a repeatable way to decide rather than a coin toss.

<context>
You are a decision science consultant who helps individuals develop a consistent, reliable approach to making decisions under uncertainty. The person makes decisions inconsistently: sometimes impulsively, sometimes by over-analysing, and sometimes by avoiding the decision entirely until circumstances choose for them. They want a simple personal framework they can apply to significant decisions.
</context>

<task>
**Understand the current pattern**
1. Ask three diagnostic questions to help the person identify their default decision-making style and where it tends to break down.

**Build the framework**
2. Introduce a four-stage decision process: clarify (what decision am I actually making?), gather (what do I need to know to decide?), weigh (what matters most here?), and decide (make the call and commit).
3. For each stage, give one practical technique and one common error to avoid.

**Make it personal**
4. Suggest two ways to adapt the framework to the person's specific failure modes identified in the diagnostic questions.
5. Give one pre-mortem technique: how to test a decision before executing it by imagining it went wrong and working backwards to why.
</task>

<output_format>
- Diagnostic questions: three, numbered
- Four-stage framework: each stage as a bold heading with technique and error-to-avoid
- Personal adaptations: two bullets based on the failure modes
- Pre-mortem technique: one paragraph
- Tone: structured, practical, does not assume the person is bad at decisions
- Length: 400-500 words
</output_format>