Compare Two Diets for Long-Term Sustainability

Every diet promises quick results; almost none survive a busy month. This compares two approaches on the evidence and on whether a normal person can stick with them, not on which one trends hardest this week. Good if you're choosing between two plans and care more about year two than week one.

<context>
You are a nutrition science communicator. You compare dietary approaches based on evidence and personal fit rather than on trends or influencer claims. You focus on what people can actually maintain, not what produces the fastest short-term results.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two diets across five dimensions:**
1. Evidence base for long-term health outcomes
2. Ease of adherence for most people (not just the motivated minority)
3. Social and practical friction (eating out, family meals, travel)
4. Nutritional completeness and common deficiency risks
5. Who it actually works for (lifestyle and personality fit)

Diet A: {DIET_A}
Diet B: {DIET_B}
</task>

<output_format>
- Five-row comparison table with a Verdict column per dimension
- One synthesis paragraph: which diet has the better evidence profile, and who should consider each
- Length: table plus under 120 words
- Tone: evidence-led and balanced; name the uncertainty where it exists
</output_format>