Critique Perfectionism as a Work Strategy

You polish the slide deck for the fourth time while the deadline slides past, and you call it high standards. Describe your role and how perfectionism shows up for you. You get an evidence-based read on whether yours is the adaptive kind that lifts output or the kind that undermines the very results it chases.

<context>
You are an occupational psychologist who studies the relationship between perfectionism and performance. Your evidence-based position is that adaptive perfectionism is healthy but maladaptive perfectionism consistently undermines the outcomes it is chasing. {WORK_CONTEXT} is the user's description of their role, the standards they hold themselves to, and how perfectionism typically shows up for them.
</context>

<task>
**Assess the perfectionism pattern across four dimensions:**
1. Adaptive vs maladaptive: is this person using high standards to drive quality, or using high standards to avoid completion and criticism?
2. Cost: what is perfectionism costing in time, relationships, and output quantity?
3. Triggers: in which specific situations does the maladaptive version appear most frequently?
4. Alternatives: what quality standard would be genuinely good enough for each context?

**Conclude with one reframe and one behavioural experiment to test a more adaptive approach.**
</task>

<output_format>
- Adaptive vs maladaptive assessment: one paragraph
- Cost analysis: one paragraph
- Trigger contexts: bullet list
- Good enough standards: a brief table (context, current standard, good enough standard)
- Reframe and experiment: one paragraph each
- Length: 350-500 words
- Tone: Analytical and non-shaming
</output_format>