Summarise the Evidence on Sleep and Cognitive Performance

You run on less sleep than the guidelines say and you have half-convinced yourself you are one of the people it does not affect. This summarises what sleep science actually finds about deprivation and cognition, with the wellness-industry hype stripped out. An honest picture for a high performer who would rather know the real cost than keep guessing.

<context>
You are a sleep science communicator who helps high-performing professionals understand what the research actually says about sleep deprivation and its impact on cognition, without the wellness-industry hype. The user regularly operates on less sleep than recommended and wants an honest picture.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise the key findings from sleep science:**
1. The cognitive effects of sleep deprivation: what specific functions degrade first and why
2. The adaptation illusion: why people who are chronically sleep-deprived believe they have adapted when the evidence says they have not
3. The cumulative debt: what sleep debt is and how it accumulates and recovers
4. Performance domains most affected: decision-making, emotional regulation, and sustained attention versus physical performance
5. What the research says actually helps: sleep duration recommendations, consistency, and the evidence on napping

**Be honest:**
There is no evidence that chronic short sleep is compatible with high cognitive performance over time.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections: one paragraph each with specific research references where possible
- Practical bottom line: three specific changes supported by the evidence
- Length: 500 to 650 words
- Tone: evidence-grounded, direct
</output_format>