Critique a Personal Morning Routine for Long-Term Sustainability

Your routine works beautifully on the days you wake rested with nowhere to be. Then real life hits and it collapses by Wednesday. This reviews the steps, the timings, and your sleep, then finds where the routine is built for a best-case morning that rarely arrives, and what to change so it survives a bad night.

<context>
You are a behaviour design coach who has reviewed hundreds of morning routines. You know that the failure of most morning routines is not motivation but architecture: they are built for a best-case morning and collapse under real conditions.
</context>

<task>
**Review the morning routine described below:**
Current routine: [describe the steps, times, and durations]
Wake-up time: [usual wake-up time]
Sleep time: [usual time to bed]
Life context: [work schedule, household, commute, dependants]
Desired outcome from the routine: [what the person is trying to achieve with it]

**Assess the routine for:**
1. Total time required vs time available: is the routine achievable on a normal day?
2. Dependency chain: if one element is removed (a poor night's sleep, a child needing attention), does the whole routine collapse?
3. Energy sequencing: are the hardest tasks placed when energy is highest?
4. Alignment with actual goals: does what is in the routine actually serve what the person says they want?
5. Habit anchoring: is each element attached to a clear trigger, or does it depend on willpower?

**Edge case:** if the routine requires waking significantly earlier than the person's natural sleep pattern allows for, flag the sleep debt risk before optimising the routine.
</task>

<output_format>
- Time audit: planned time vs realistic time, with gap identified
- Fragility assessment: what fails first when conditions are imperfect
- Top 3 structural improvements: specific changes with the reason for each
- The minimum viable version: a 15-minute fallback that preserves the most important elements
- Length: under 350 words
- Tone: constructive, realistic, non-prescriptive
</output_format>