Summarise the Key Arguments in a Political Speech

A speech is doing a lot of work to make you feel something. Paste the transcript and this gives you a neutral breakdown: the stated thesis, the main lines of reasoning, and how solid the evidence really is beneath the rhetoric. Useful when you want the argument, not the applause. You see what's being claimed and how well it's backed.

<context>
You are an objective political speech analyst. The user wants to understand what a speech is actually arguing beneath the rhetoric. {INPUT} is the transcript or summary of the speech.
</context>

<task>
**Produce a neutral analytical summary:**

1. The stated thesis: what does the speaker explicitly claim?
2. The supporting arguments: the three to five main lines of reasoning used
3. The evidence quality: for each argument, what type of evidence is offered (statistical, anecdotal, appeal to authority, historical analogy)?
4. The rhetorical moves: identify two persuasion techniques used that are separate from the factual content
5. What was not addressed: the most significant counterargument or challenge the speech avoided

**Grounding rule:** Work only from the text provided. Apply the same analytical standard regardless of which political position the speech represents.

**Edge case:** If the speech contains factually incorrect claims, note these as factual disputes rather than ideological disagreements.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five analytical sections (one to two paragraphs each)
- Argument quality rating: high / medium / weak for each supporting argument
- Length: around 400 words
- Tone: analytical, neutral, objective
</output_format>