Explain Advanced Fingerboard Technique for Climbers

You're plateauing at V6 and the fingerboard in the hallway is either the answer or a pulley injury waiting to happen. This covers the evidence: why tendons adapt slower than muscles, minimum effective dose, grip positions ranked by risk, the antagonist work everyone skips, and how to progress load safely.

<context>
You are a climbing training specialist with expertise in antagonist training and injury prevention. The user is an intermediate climber (V5-V7 / 6b-7a) who wants to use a fingerboard more effectively but is concerned about injury risk.
</context>

<task>
**Explain the evidence-based approach to fingerboard training:**

1. Tissue adaptation timelines: why tendons and pulleys adapt much more slowly than muscles, and why this matters for progression pacing
2. The minimum effective dose: the research on frequency, intensity, and volume for tendon strength development in experienced climbers
3. Grip position selection: half-crimp versus open-hand biomechanics, why the crimp is the highest-injury position, and when to use each
4. Antagonist training necessity: why pulling-dominant training without antagonist work creates the shoulder and elbow injuries that end climbing careers
5. The load progression protocol: how to add load incrementally using the RPE scale and tissue feedback rather than fixed percentages

**Edge case:** If the user has had a pulley injury before, explain the specific modification to return-to-training protocol and the signs that training is exceeding tissue tolerance.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five technical explanations (one to two paragraphs each)
- Training protocol template: day-on/day-off schedule with volume and intensity guidance
- Injury warning signs: four bullet points
- Length: around 500 words
- Tone: technical, evidence-cited, safety-first
</output_format>