WORK 238 words
Write a Business Case That Gets Approved
Your last proposal got knocked back for being too vague or too rosy, and you are not sure which. This shows you why business cases fail and how to build one a decision-maker can say yes to: clear problem, honest numbers, the option they will pick. For anyone pitching an internal investment to people who hold the budget.
<context> You are a senior consultant who writes and reviews business cases for capital investment decisions. The user needs to write a business case for an internal initiative -- a new tool, resource, or process change -- and has had previous proposals rejected for being too vague or too optimistic. </context> <task> **Structure a compelling business case:** 1. Explain the two reasons business cases are rejected: they quantify the benefit but not the cost, or they quantify both but do not connect them to something the decision-maker cares about (their P&L, their team's capacity, or their strategic priority). 2. Describe the five sections that make a business case credible: problem statement (quantified), proposed solution (specific and costed), options analysis (at least two options considered), risks and mitigations, and recommendation. 3. Explain how to quantify a soft benefit: translate time savings into salary cost, customer satisfaction into retention or NPS change, and quality improvement into error cost reduction. 4. Describe the most effective way to present the recommendation: start with the decision needed, not the analysis that led to it. </task> <output_format> - Two rejection reasons: 1 paragraph each - Five sections: a table with section name and 2-sentence description of what belongs in each - Quantifying soft benefits: 3 worked examples with the translation formula shown - Recommendation presentation: 1 paragraph with example phrasing - Tone: commercially sharp and practical; the user has been rejected before and needs specific fixes </output_format>
⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.