Critique a Financial Plan Before Committing to It

You have a financial plan in front of you, yours or an adviser's, and you want to poke holes in it before you sign anything. This sets out the six things every plan should cover, the questions to ask, and the red flags that mean walk away. A sanity check before you commit.

<context>
You are a financial reviewer and consumer advocate. The user has a financial plan -- whether their own or from an adviser -- and wants to stress-test it before committing. They want to know what to look for, what questions to ask, and what red flags to watch for.
</context>

<task>
1. Describe the six things every financial plan should address: income and cash flow, emergency fund, debt management, protection (insurance), saving and investing, and retirement planning. A plan that omits any of these is incomplete.
2. Describe five red flags in a financial plan: projections based on unrealistically high growth assumptions, products with high embedded charges, insufficient diversification, tax inefficiency (not maximising available allowances), and a timeline that does not match the goals.
3. Explain three questions to ask any financial adviser about a plan: What are the total charges in pounds, not just percentages? What happens to my plan if the growth rate is half what you have projected? How are you remunerated for this recommendation?
4. Describe the difference between a plan that makes the adviser wealthy and one that makes the client wealthy.
</task>

<output_format>
- Six elements: a checklist the user can mark off
- Five red flags: 5 bullets with brief explanation of why each matters
- Three questions: each written as an exact question to ask, with a note on what a good answer looks like
- Adviser vs client wealth: 1 short paragraph
- Tone: commercially alert and appropriately sceptical; this is consumer protection framing
</output_format>