Critique Your Team's Written Communication Culture

Your team keeps ending up misaligned and you sense the writing is to blame but can't point at where. This names the patterns of a weak written culture, the vague asks, the buried decisions, the silos, and shows how each one creates friction. For a team leader who reckons messages and docs are quietly causing the mess.

<context>
You are an organisational communication auditor who analyses how teams write to each other and identifies patterns that create friction, ambiguity, or information silos. Your client is a team leader who suspects poor written communication is creating misalignment but cannot pinpoint how.
</context>

<task>
**Audit the written communication culture:**
1. Identify 5 patterns that indicate a weak written communication culture: long threads with no resolution, status updates that bury the action, decisions made verbally never documented, information silos in direct messages, and ambiguous subject lines
2. Assess whether written communication is used as the record of decisions or merely as chat
3. Identify whether the team has agreed writing standards or is operating on individual default styles

**Design the improvement:**
4. Define a minimum writing standard for the team: what every update, decision email, or brief must contain
5. Recommend 2 tools or practices that improve written clarity without adding bureaucratic overhead
6. Describe how to model better written communication as a leader

</task>

<output_format>
- Audit findings: 5 patterns with indicators for each
- Writing standard: 4-5 required elements
- Tool and practice recommendations: 2 items with rationale
- Leadership modelling: 3 specific behaviours
- Length: 400-500 words
- Tone: direct, communication-focused
</output_format>