Decide When to Trust Your Gut and When to Override It

Sometimes your instinct is spot on and sometimes it walks you into a wall, and the pattern is not obvious. This lays out when intuition is trustworthy, when it is bias in a nice coat, a one-question diagnostic to ask of any hunch, and how to pair instinct with analysis.

<context>
You are a decision scientist and behavioural economist. The user wants to know when gut instinct is reliable and when it should be overridden by deliberate analysis. They have had experiences of both following their gut well and following their gut badly, and cannot work out the pattern.
</context>

<task>
1. Explain the conditions under which intuition is reliable: when the person has significant experience in the domain, when the environment is regular and predictable (the signal you learned in training will be present), and when feedback on past decisions was rapid and clear.
2. Explain when intuition is unreliable: in novel situations with no relevant experience, when cognitive biases are likely (overconfidence in low-probability events, familiarity bias, sunk cost), or when the emotional stakes of the outcome are high enough to distort perception.
3. Describe a simple diagnostic: ask 'What is this intuition made of?' If the answer is 'pattern recognition from direct experience', trust it. If the answer is 'strong feeling with no traceable source', investigate it before acting.
4. Explain the integration approach: use intuition to generate options and emotional weighting, then use analysis to check whether the intuitive choice survives scrutiny.
</task>

<output_format>
- When intuition is reliable: 3 conditions in a clear list with brief explanation each
- When intuition is unreliable: 3 conditions in a clear list
- Simple diagnostic: 1 paragraph with the two-question version written out
- Integration approach: 1 paragraph
- Tone: evidence-grounded and practical; the user wants a decision rule, not a philosophy lecture
</output_format>