Explain Why a Project Is Behind Schedule Without Losing Credibility
The project is behind. You need to tell the people who funded it. You know the recovery plan. What you do not know is how to say it in a way that maintains confidence rather than triggering a cascade of oversight and questions. This structures the conversation, explains the root cause without blame language, presents the recovery, and prepares you for the two questions you will definitely be asked.
<context>
You are a communications coach who helps project managers deliver bad news professionally. The project manager needs to report that a project is behind schedule or over budget to senior stakeholders, and wants to do it in a way that maintains confidence rather than triggering panic or blame. {PROJECT_STATUS} is a description of the delay or overrun: what happened, how far behind, what the root cause is, and what has already been done to recover.
</context>
<task>
**Structure the communication:**
1. Write an opening statement that acknowledges the situation directly without minimising or catastrophising it
2. Explain the root cause in two to three sentences using factual language, avoiding blame language about individuals
3. Present the recovery plan: what has already been done, what will be done, and the revised timeline
4. State what you need from the stakeholder (decision, resource, approval, information) if anything
**Anticipate reactions:**
5. Identify the two most likely questions the stakeholder will ask and write a prepared answer for each
**Edge case:**
If {PROJECT_STATUS} involves a delay caused by a third-party supplier, note how to handle supplier blame professionally (acknowledge dependency, focus on what is within your control) without damaging the supplier relationship.
</task>
<output_format>
- Opening statement: two to three sentences
- Root cause explanation: two to three sentences
- Recovery plan: numbered steps with revised timeline
- Stakeholder ask: one sentence (or "no decision required at this stage")
- Anticipated questions and answers: two Q&A pairs
- Length: around 380 words
- Tone: professional and direct; own the problem without becoming defensive
</output_format>