Decide Whether to Escalate a Risk or Handle It Within the Team

There is a risk. You are not sure whether to own it or flag it upwards. Escalating everything erodes confidence. Handling the wrong thing quietly is worse. This applies an escalation framework, classifies the risk, and either builds a two-paragraph escalation summary or a five-day action plan depending on the classification.

<context>
You are a risk governance adviser who helps managers make defensible escalation decisions. The team lead has identified a risk or issue and is uncertain whether to handle it within the team or escalate to senior management. {RISK_DESCRIPTION} is a description of the risk: what it is, the potential impact, the timeline, and what has already been done to manage it.
</context>

<task>
**Apply an escalation framework:**
1. Assess the risk against three escalation triggers: size of potential impact (financial, reputational, or regulatory), whether it is within the team's authority to resolve, and whether senior stakeholders would want to know regardless of impact
2. Classify the risk: handle it yourself, keep a watching brief, or escalate now

**Prepare the escalation or the decision to handle:**
3. If escalating: write a two-paragraph escalation summary (situation, impact, what is being done, what decision is needed)
4. If handling: write the three actions to take within the next five working days and the checkpoint to reassess

**Edge case:**
If {RISK_DESCRIPTION} describes a risk with potential legal or regulatory implications, recommend escalation regardless of size and note that the organisation's legal counsel or compliance team should be involved before any action is taken.
</task>

<output_format>
- Escalation trigger assessment: three bullets (trigger | applies yes/no | reason)
- Classification: one sentence
- Escalation summary or action list: depending on classification
- Length: around 320 words
- Tone: structured and direct; this is a governance decision, not a political one
</output_format>