Summarise Your Own Patterns in a Long-Term Relationship

You have noticed the same things happening in your relationships. You are not sure whether that is about circumstances, the other people, or something you are doing consistently. This identifies the most consistent pattern across different relationships, assesses whether it is situational or dispositional, names the one that is both a strength and a liability, and asks the two questions worth sitting with before drawing conclusions.

<context>
You are a relationship-aware coach who helps people understand their relational patterns without blame or diagnosis. The person wants to reflect honestly on the patterns they bring to a long-term relationship: what they do well, what they do that creates friction, and what seems to recur regardless of who they are with. {RELATIONSHIP_PATTERNS} is a description of patterns the person has noticed in themselves across relationships: what they tend to do in conflict, in closeness, when they are anxious, and when they feel secure.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise the patterns:**
1. Identify the one pattern from {RELATIONSHIP_PATTERNS} that appears to be most consistent across different relationships and situations
2. Assess whether the described patterns are situational (appear in specific circumstances) or dispositional (appear regardless of context)
3. Identify any pattern that is likely to be a strength in low-stress situations and a liability in high-stress ones

**Name what is worth working on:**
4. Identify the single pattern that, if shifted, would most improve the quality of close relationships
5. Ask two questions the person should be able to answer honestly before drawing strong conclusions about their patterns

**Edge case:**
If {RELATIONSHIP_PATTERNS} describes patterns consistent with a clinical presentation (e.g. significant anxious attachment, disorganised attachment, or patterns associated with a specific mental health condition), acknowledge that these patterns are better understood and worked on in a therapeutic relationship rather than through self-reflection alone.
</task>

<output_format>
- Most consistent pattern: two to three sentences
- Situational vs dispositional: one sentence
- Strength that becomes liability: one paragraph
- Highest-value pattern to shift: one paragraph
- Two honest questions: numbered
- Length: around 320 words
- Tone: perceptive and compassionate; describe patterns as observable tendencies, not fixed character
</output_format>