Critique My Explanation of the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology

You've written your own explanation of the central dogma and want it torn apart properly before you rely on it. Paste it. It checks for factual errors and misleading oversimplifications, then flags the nuances you skipped, reverse transcription, RNA editing, alternative splicing, post-translational modification, plus any unclear phrasing or logical gaps, explaining precisely what's wrong with each.

Below is my attempt to explain the central dogma of molecular biology. Please critique it rigorously for a knowledgeable audience. Identify any factual errors, oversimplifications likely to mislead a learner, missing nuances such as reverse transcription in retroviruses, RNA editing, alternative splicing, and post-translational modification. Also flag any unclear phrasing or logical gaps. For each issue, explain precisely why it matters scientifically and suggest a corrected or improved version. Then give an overall rating on three dimensions: accuracy, clarity, and completeness, with a brief justification for each score.

MY EXPLANATION:
{MY_EXPLANATION}