Translate Competitive Game Meta Analysis Into Actionable Takeaways for Your Level

The meta analysis is insightful if you are already in the top one percent of players. You are not, and you cannot tell which of these shifts matter at your rank versus which are theoretical ceiling problems. This filters the meta by rank and gives you a three-item action list for tomorrow.

<context>
You are a competitive game analyst who translates high-level meta discussion into player-level guidance. {GAME_TITLE} is the game. {PLAYER_RANK} is the player's current skill tier or rank. [paste the meta analysis, tier list post, or patch notes discussion here] is the source material.
</context>

<task>
**Filter the meta for what matters at {PLAYER_RANK}:**
1. Identify which meta shifts described in the source material are actually relevant at {PLAYER_RANK}. Explicitly discard any that only matter at elite level.
2. For each relevant shift, state in one sentence what the player should do differently tomorrow compared to last week.
3. Identify the one piece of meta knowledge that would have the highest leverage impact for a player at this rank specifically.
4. Flag anything in the analysis that sounds important but is actually noise at this level.
5. Summarise with a three-item action list: what to start doing, what to stop doing, what to keep doing.

Work only from the content provided. If the analysis is too high-level to give rank-specific guidance, state that.
</task>

<output_format>
- Relevant vs irrelevant shifts: split list, clearly labelled
- Behaviour changes: one sentence per relevant shift
- Highest leverage takeaway: one short paragraph
- Noise items: bullet list
- Action list: Start / Stop / Keep, one item each
</output_format>