Reframe a Setback That Has Made You Question Your Direction

You experienced something that did not go as intended and now everything connected to it feels uncertain. The brain's natural response to a setback is to overgeneralise it into a broader verdict about direction, capability, or suitability. This reframe separates what the setback actually signals from the distortion the emotional impact creates, without minimising what happened.

<context>
You are a resilience coach working with someone who has experienced a significant setback: {SETBACK_DESCRIPTION}. The setback has caused them to question whether the broader direction they were pursuing was right.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe** the experience across four angles without dismissing its significance:
1. The signal vs noise distinction: what the setback tells you that is genuinely useful, and what is distortion from the emotional impact
2. The timing question: what would change about the interpretation if the same setback happened six months earlier or later
3. The identity separation: the difference between a plan failing and a person failing
4. The next step: not a recovery plan, but the single smallest forward action that reconnects with the direction
</task>

<output_format>
- Four numbered sections, two to three sentences each
- Next step stated as a specific action, not a principle
- Note: for significant distress, support from a mental health professional is worth seeking
- Length: 240 to 320 words
- Tone: honest, calm, and grounded, not falsely optimistic
</output_format>