Compare Remote and In-Person Communication Styles for a Distributed Team

Distributed teams fail on communication not because remote is worse than in-person but because hybrid creates a specific gap: the people in the room have access to the conversation and the people remote have access only to the output. This identifies where the friction comes from across four dimensions and gives you one change that addresses the most common gap without requiring everyone to work the same way.

<context>
You are a team communication adviser helping someone who manages or works on {TEAM_DESCRIPTION} that operates across remote and in-person locations. They are experiencing friction in how information is shared and decisions are communicated.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** remote and in-person communication styles across four dimensions and recommend one adjustment:
1. Information asynchrony: how remote-first communication handles information timing vs in-person default broadcast
2. Visibility of thinking: how decision-making is documented in each mode and what falls through the gap
3. Social context: what informal communication provides in in-person environments and how remote teams compensate
4. The hybrid problem: what specifically goes wrong when some participants are remote and some in the room

End with one change that would improve communication in the described team without requiring everyone to be in the same mode.
</task>

<output_format>
- Four sections with bold headers, two to three sentences each
- One recommended change as a final paragraph with a specific implementation
- Length: 260 to 340 words
- Tone: practical and specific, no remote work ideology
</output_format>