Evaluate Two Job Offers Across More Than Just Salary

Most job offer comparisons are spreadsheets with salary, benefits, and commute. The things that determine whether a role is good in three years (trajectory, manager quality, culture) are harder to measure but more important. This evaluates two offers across those harder dimensions, including a regret minimisation frame and the one question to answer about yourself before deciding.

I have two job offers and I cannot decide. The offers are:

**Offer A:** {OFFER_A_SUMMARY}
**Offer B:** {OFFER_B_SUMMARY}

Help me evaluate them across dimensions that a spreadsheet comparison typically misses:
1. **Career trajectory**: which role is more likely to give me interesting work to talk about in [three years] and a stronger next job option
2. **Manager quality signals**: based on what I describe of the hiring process and what I know of the managers, what can be inferred about how each manager leads
3. **Culture fit evidence**: what concrete signals from the recruitment process and role design indicate about the actual culture, not the stated values
4. **Regret minimisation**: if I take Offer A and it is worse than expected, what do I lose? If I take Offer B and it is worse than expected, what do I lose? Which failure mode is more recoverable?

End with the one question I should answer about myself before making the decision.