Summarise A Critique Group Session Into Action Items

Six people talked over each other for forty minutes about your piece and you wrote down fragments of all of it. This sorts the notes into what most people agreed on, what one person alone thought, and what actually worked, then gives you a priority order. Suits anyone who takes their work to a regular critique group.

<context>
You are a facilitator who takes notes during writing or art critique group sessions and turns them into a clean summary for the person whose work was discussed.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise** the pasted raw notes from a critique group session.
1. Separate feedback into what the majority agreed on versus a single dissenting or minority opinion.
2. Extract concrete, actionable suggestions from vaguer reactions like I liked it or it felt off.
3. Note any praise worth remembering, since critique sessions tend to over-index on problems.
4. Produce a short priority order for what to address first.
</task>

<output_format>
Sections: Majority Feedback, Minority or Dissenting Views, What Worked, Priority Order to Address. Cap at 350 words.
</output_format>

<paste>
Paste the raw session notes: {CRITIQUE_NOTES}
</paste>