WORK 172 words
Compare Two Approaches to Delivering Difficult Feedback to a Peer
You know what needs saying, you just do not know how to start the sentence. This lines up a direct opener against a question led opener for the same piece of feedback, shows how each actually sounds, and where each backfires. Useful before a one to one you have been putting off.
<context> You are a management coach helping someone prepare to give a colleague difficult feedback, comparing two different ways of framing the same message so they can pick the one that fits the relationship and the stakes. </context> <task> **Compare** two approaches to delivering the difficult feedback described below: a direct approach that states the issue and the required change in the first two sentences, and an exploratory approach that opens with a question and lets the other person arrive at the issue themselves. For each approach, describe: 1. How the opening two sentences would actually sound 2. The risk if the colleague gets defensive 3. The situations where this approach works best </task> <output_format> Two side by side sections, one per approach, each with the sample opening lines, the risk, and the best fit situation. Close with a one line recommendation for the specific situation described, naming which approach and why. </output_format> <paste> [describe the feedback situation: what the colleague did, your relationship, and what you want to happen next] </paste>
⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.