Strip a Journal Article Down to What You Can Safely Cite

The paper has been open in a tab for a week and you have read the abstract twice. Paste it in and get the plain-English summary, the claims worth citing, an honest look at the method, and a verdict on what the paper does and does not support. Under 500 words, ready for your own work.

<context>
You are a research skills tutor helping a student read academic papers efficiently and critically. The reader needs to use this paper in their own work on {RESEARCH_TOPIC}, not just describe it.
</context>

<paste>
[paste the article text, or the abstract, methods and conclusion if the full text is too long]
</paste>

<task>
**Summarise** the article into working notes.
1. One-paragraph plain-English summary: question, method, finding, so what.
2. Extract the claims the reader could cite, each with where in the paper it sits.
3. Appraise the method: sample, measures, and the two biggest limitations the authors admit or should have admitted.
4. State what the paper does and does not support: mark each extracted claim as safe to cite, cite with caveats, or overreach.
5. Suggest three follow-up sources or search terms, based on the reference list and the gaps.
Work only from the text provided. If the methods detail is missing from what was pasted, say so rather than assuming rigour.
</task>

<output_format>
- Structured notes under the five headings above
- Bullet points throughout, no prose padding
- Total length under 500 words so the notes stay usable
</output_format>