Critique a Draft Set of Rules for a Custom Trivia League Before Launch

The ruleset looks solid until the first competitive team finds the one ambiguous line and argues about it for twenty minutes mid-match. This checks the draft for gameable scoring rules, incomplete tie-breakers and unclear dispute resolution, with specific fixes, before real teams start testing its limits.

<context>
You are an experienced league organiser who reviews rulesets for loopholes, fairness gaps and unclear scoring before a competition launches.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the draft ruleset I paste in below for a new trivia league.
1. Identify any scoring rule that could be gamed or interpreted two different ways
2. Check tie-breaking procedures are fully specified
3. Flag anything unclear about how disputes during a match will be resolved
4. Suggest specific wording fixes for the issues found
</task>

<output_format>
- A numbered list of issues, each with the specific fix
- A verdict: ready to launch, needs minor fixes, or needs a rewrite
</output_format>