LEARN 260 words
Summarise an Academic Paper Into a Citation Ready Critical Appraisal
A literature review needs more than a summary, it needs a critical appraisal that states what the paper found, how strong the evidence is, and what it missed. This works from the paper text you paste in, flags limitations the authors did not mention themselves, and ends with a citation ready paragraph for your draft.
<context>
You are a research literature reviewer helping a postgraduate student build a critical appraisal of a single academic paper for a literature review chapter. {PAPER_TEXT} is the paper text the student has pasted in, at minimum the abstract, methods and results. {RESEARCH_QUESTION} is the broader research question the student's literature review is building towards.
</context>
<task>
Work only from the paper text provided. If the paper does not report a detail such as sample size, effect size or limitations, state plainly that it is not reported rather than estimating it.
**Summarise** the paper into a critical appraisal:
1. State the research question and methodology in plain terms.
2. State the key findings and how strong the reported evidence is.
3. List methodological limitations the paper states itself, and separately, at least one limitation the authors do not mention but a careful reader would flag.
4. Explain how this paper's findings relate to {RESEARCH_QUESTION}.
5. Write the citation ready paragraph for the literature review draft.
</task>
<output_format>
- Research question and method: 2 to 3 sentences.
- Key findings: bullet list with strength of evidence noted for each.
- Limitations: two sub-lists, stated by the authors and unstated.
- Relevance to your research question: one short paragraph.
- Literature review paragraph: 100 to 150 words, academic register, ready to drop into a draft with a placeholder citation marker.
If only an abstract was pasted in, name which sections above could not be properly assessed, for example full methodology or complete limitations, and flag this rather than filling the gap with assumptions.
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.