Reframe a Rejected Pitch as a Structural Problem, Not a Talent Problem

A pass on a pitch arrives with feedback that could mean three different things, and the encouraging version everyone gives you does not help you tell which. This reads the actual feedback and tells you plainly whether it is a structural issue, a buyer mismatch, or the idea genuinely needing work.

Reframe this rejection feedback on my creative pitch without the usual comfort language: {FEEDBACK}, for the pitch {PITCH}. Identify specifically whether the feedback points to a structural problem with the pitch itself, a mismatch with what this particular buyer wants, or something that actually needs reworking in the underlying idea. Do not offer generic encouragement. Under 150 words.